Case 6000742/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Hopkinson v RH Commercial Vehicles — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000742/2023
- Decision date
- 15 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge V Butler Members
- Venue
- Nottingham via CVP Heard
- Panel members
- Ms C Hatcliffe, Ms H Andrews
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Hopkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Nottingham via CVP and comprising Employment Judge V Butler with Ms C Hatcliffe and Ms H Andrews, heard Ms M Hopkinson's claims against RH Commercial Vehicles. The only outcome recorded in the judgment is that the Claimant's claim of direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the alternative harassment claim failed and was dismissed. No separate reasons, factual findings, or remedy assessment are set out in the short judgment text provided.
The decision is unanimous and is dated 7 February 2025, with the judgment sent to the parties on 15 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim of direct race discrimination failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the alternative harassment claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.