Case 6000982/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Green v Biffa Waste Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000982/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bristol by CVP on 19 to 22 May 2025 before Employment Judge Livesey. The claimant, Mr G Green, appeared in person and the respondent, Biffa Waste Services Ltd, was represented by counsel. The written record states that the tribunal gave reasons orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of discrimination on the grounds of disability. It also dismissed the claimant's complaints of detriment and dismissal said to have been because he made public interest disclosures. The judgment record contains the outcomes only and does not set out further findings in the written extract provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment on grounds of having made protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of dismissal on grounds of having made protected disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.