Case 6001072/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Trott v Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001072/2023
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray AND
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Trott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Mr Trott brought complaints against the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency of unfair constructive dismissal and disability discrimination. The disability discrimination complaints were identified as failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments, something arising from disability, and harassment.
The judgment states that all of those complaints failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not set out the Tribunal's detailed factual findings or reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the complaint as "unfair constructive dismissal" and states that it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination because of something arising from disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment on the grounds of disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.