Case 6001073/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Mason v G A Carers Franchises Limited T/A Guardian Angels Carers — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001073/2023
- Decision date
- 11 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Ms Whitlam, Mr Richardson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Mason
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Southampton, sitting before Employment Judge Dawson with Ms Whitlam and Mr Richardson, recorded that Mrs C Mason was unfairly dismissed by G A Carers Franchises Limited T/A Guardian Angels Carers. It also found that the respondent discriminated against her by failing to make reasonable adjustments and by dismissing her.
The judgment further records that the respondent harassed the claimant on the grounds of her disability. The written record does not set out detailed reasons for those findings because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in this document.
The question of remedy was adjourned to 12 July 2024, and the claimant was directed to give further disclosure of documents relevant to remedy by 4pm on 21 June 2024. The judgment was sent to the parties on 11 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the respondent discriminated against the claimant by failing to make reasonable adjustments and dismissing her. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records harassment on the grounds of the claimant's disability. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.