Case 6001174/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001174/2023
- Decision date
- 25 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr P Bompass, Mr L Wakeman
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Southampton Employment Tribunal on 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14 October 2024, Employment Judge Rayner sat with Mr P Bompass and Mr L Wakeman. The written judgment dismisses the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010, direct disability discrimination under section 13, discrimination arising from disability under section 15, harassment related to race under section 26, and victimisation under section 27.
The record also dismisses the claimant's allegation that she was discriminated against on grounds of race and/or disability in that she was constructively and unfairly dismissed. The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination contrary to section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination contrary to section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination for a reason arising from disability contrary to section 15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race contrary to section 26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation contrary to section 27 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records an allegation that the claimant was discriminated against on grounds of race and/or disability in that she was constructively and unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.