Case 6001243/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Jankunas v Flamingo Flowers Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001243/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
- Venue
- In Chambers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Jankunas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shore considered the matter in chambers on the papers on 22 May 2024. The only substantive claim identified in the judgment was a claim for breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in respect of the 48-hour working week.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not comply with the unless order made in the case management order of 29 January 2024. That order required him, by 4:00pm on Wednesday 7 February 2024, to write to the Tribunal and the respondent setting out the legal and factual basis of the Working Time Regulations claim.
Because the claimant failed to comply with that order, the tribunal struck out the claim for breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 in respect of the 48-hour working week. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any other substantive remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claimant failed to comply with the unless order in the case management order dated 29 January 2024, which required him to set out the legal and factual basis of his Working Time Regulations 1998 claim about the 48-hour working week by 4:00pm on 7 February 2024. The tribunal therefore struck out that claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.