Case 6001485/2025 · Employment Tribunal
- IN PERSON FOR THE v Sol Attendance Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6001485/2025
- Decision date
- 16 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
- IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought a claim for a statutory redundancy payment against her former employer, which had entered creditors voluntary liquidation. The hearing was held at Bristol on 16 January 2026 before Employment Judge Cadney sitting alone, with the Claimant in person and no attendance from the Respondent.
The Tribunal noted that, unlike some forms of insolvency, creditors voluntary liquidation does not affect the Tribunal's ability to continue with the hearing. There was no dispute that the Claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to statutory redundancy pay of £12,000.
It was also agreed that the Claimant had received £4,500 in part payment, leaving a balance of £7,500 outstanding. Judgment was entered for the Claimant for the outstanding balance of £7,500.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Claim for statutory redundancy payment of £12,000 well-founded; £4,500 already received, balance of £7,500 outstanding and ordered to be paid. Respondent in creditors voluntary liquidation. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
| Redundancy | Claim for statutory redundancy payment of £12,000 well-founded; £4,500 already received, balance of £7,500 outstanding and ordered to be paid. Respondent in creditors voluntary liquidation. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.