Case 6001516/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person. The v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001516/2024
- Decision date
- 23 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Representation
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person. The
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal determined at a preliminary hearing whether the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 between 13 February 2023 and 3 June 2024. The claimant relied on several contended impairments, including lower back pain, neurodiverse conditions, hearing issues, depression or work-related stress, and their cumulative effect.
The Tribunal was not satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that any of the contended impairments, alone or cumulatively, established disability at the relevant time. It found that the physical impairments had not been shown to have a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, that the claimant had not established a diagnosed neurodiverse condition, and that depression or work-related stress had not been shown to satisfy the statutory test.
Because the claimant's complaints were limited to disability discrimination and he had not established disability at the relevant time, the Tribunal dismissed the disability discrimination complaints and vacated the final hearing listed for 21 to 25 July 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records complaints of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments. They were dismissed at a preliminary hearing because the claimant was not found to be a disabled person under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment identifies a harassment complaint under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 as part of the disability discrimination case. It was dismissed because the claimant was not found to be a disabled person at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.