Case 6001725/2024 · Employment Tribunal
NOELINE ADIEDO v St Anne'S Community Services and 4 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001725/2024
- Decision date
- 5 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
6 namedClaimant
NOELINE ADIEDO
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP video conferencing on 5 September 2024 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by Mr P Mills.
The judgment states that the claim was dismissed following withdrawal by email timed at 9.14 am that day. No reasons on the merits were given, and the judgment records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records only that the claim was dismissed following withdrawal by email timed at 9.14 am on 5 September 2024; it does not set out separate merits findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only that the claim was dismissed following withdrawal by email timed at 9.14 am on 5 September 2024; it does not set out separate merits findings for this head. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.