Case 6001765/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs AM Baxter v Weston and District Community Transport — 2024
- Case reference
- 6001765/2023
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Mr H Launder, Ms S Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs AM Baxter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol on 12 August 2024, Employment Judge Livesey sitting with Mr H Launder and Ms S Maidment recorded that Mrs AM Baxter’s claim against Weston and District Community Transport succeeded. The written judgment states that she suffered harassment and discrimination under ss. 26 and 60 of the Equality Act 2010. The published record does not set out further written reasons, noting instead that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The written record states that the claimant succeeded in harassment under s.26 of the Equality Act 2010; it does not separate the factual basis from the other Equality Act finding in the published text. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written record states that the claimant succeeded in discrimination under s.60 of the Equality Act 2010. No further subtype or separate factual detail is given in the published record. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,310
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.