Case 6001913/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Chibisa v Circle Health Group Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6001913/2025
- Decision date
- 25 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Chibisa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Chibisa did not attend the further case management preliminary hearing on 25 June 2026. Tribunal staff telephoned him twice, but the calls went to voicemail, and also emailed him without receiving a reply. The respondent's representative reported that there had been no contact with him since the previous hearing.
The hearing had been arranged principally to clarify the issues and set directions. Mr Chibisa had been ordered to comment on the revised draft list of issues within 14 days of receiving it, but he did not respond or provide those comments. The Tribunal's portal and email inbox showed no contact from him since the previous hearing.
Employment Judge Cawthray considered that arranging another preliminary hearing would cause the respondent prejudice, additional cost and further delay. In the absence of a reasonable explanation for Mr Chibisa's non-attendance, and noting his failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders, the Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The unfair dismissal and whistleblowing claims were therefore dismissed without determination of their substantive merits. The judge added that, had the claim not been dismissed under Rule 47, she would have been minded to strike it out under Rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and Tribunal orders had not been complied with. No monetary remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend the hearing; the Tribunal did not determine its substantive merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the Claimant did not attend the hearing; the Tribunal did not determine its substantive merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Overriding Objective
- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.