Case 6002128/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Moody v Treymaine Ltd t/a Chiltern Mills (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 6002128/2023
- Decision date
- 7 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley On
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Moody
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds Employment Tribunal on 7 May 2024, before Employment Judge Deeley, Mr L Moody’s complaints of discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and disability-related harassment under the Equality Act 2010 were all upheld. The respondent, Treymaine Ltd t/a Chiltern Mills (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation), did not enter a response and did not attend the hearing.
The judgment notes that Mr Moody was made redundant on 22 October 2023 while absent on sick leave. It also records that he had already received statutory redundancy pay and accrued holiday pay. The tribunal noted that the claimant gave evidence and relied on documents and matters discussed at the preliminary hearing.
The tribunal awarded £25,000 for injury to feelings and £3,399.25 as compensation for the difference between statutory sick pay and normal pay during the claimant’s sick leave from 4 September 2023 until his redundancy on 22 October 2023, making a total award of £28,399.25.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability; the judgment does not split the award between claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments; the judgment does not split the award between claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of disability-related harassment; the judgment does not split the award between claims. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £28,399
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,399
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.