Case 6002769/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Wills v Progressive Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002769/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Wills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 22 February 2025, the Tribunal gave Mrs Wills an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The potential grounds were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's orders, as identified in the respondent solicitor's letter of 10 February 2025, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Wills sent an email on 8 March 2025 referring to difficulties she was facing, but the Tribunal found that it gave no indication of compliance with the Tribunal's orders, any likely compliance, or any intention to seek to comply. The Tribunal therefore found that the claim was not being progressed by her and struck it out. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Maidment on 14 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment only states that 'the claim' was struck out and does not identify this head of claim in the reasons; this type is taken from the case context/listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment only states that 'the claim' was struck out and does not identify this head of claim in the reasons; this type is taken from the case context/listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment only states that 'the claim' was struck out and does not identify this head of claim in the reasons; this type is taken from the case context/listing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.