Case 6002951/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Adeniyi Olawale Adeniji v Cygnet Health Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002951/2025
- Decision date
- 7 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Akhtar Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Adeniyi Olawale Adeniji
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that the claimant had been given an opportunity, by letter dated 8 September 2025, to make representations about why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 8 May 2025 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing, so the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as race discrimination. The judgment states only that the claim is struck out for non-compliance with an order and because it has not been actively pursued; it does not address the merits. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The gov.uk listing categorised the case as unfair dismissal. The judgment states only that the claim is struck out for non-compliance with an order and because it has not been actively pursued; it does not address the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.