Case 6003296/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Taher Kanchwala v Pierpoint International (UK) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6003296/2025
- Decision date
- 13 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Taher Kanchwala
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningTaher Kanchwala's claim against Pierpoint International UK LTD was struck out. The respondent company had been dissolved, and the claimant had not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
On 13 March 2026, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason, and the Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not successfully applied to restore it to the Register of Companies, and the claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.