Case 6003799/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Wolde Senbet v Pierpoint International (UK) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6003799/2024
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Wolde Senbet
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 19 September 2024 before Employment Judge Park at East London Hearing Centre by CVP, the claimant, Miss B Wolde Senbet, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment also noted that the respondent's name had been amended from Accenture Group Worldwide Ltd to Pierpoint International (UK) Ltd because of a change of name recorded at Companies House.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim. It ordered the respondent to pay £6,730.00 gross. No separate breakdown of the award into different heads of loss was given in the written judgment, and no further reasons were set out beyond the outcome recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeded and ordered payment of £6,730.00 gross. The respondent did not attend the hearing. | Upheld | — | £6,730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,730
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.