Case 6003820/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Sarkar v Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust FULL MERITS HEARING AT LONDON CENTRAL Heard between 16, 17, 22, 23 and 24 September 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 6003820/2024
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle For
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Sarkar brought claims against Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust for direct disability discrimination, direct sex discrimination, direct race discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments on account of disability, and harassment on account of race. The written judgment records that the direct disability discrimination claims were withdrawn by the Claimant on 16 September 2025 and were therefore dismissed.
The tribunal dismissed the remaining claims. It found that the claims of direct sex discrimination and direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 failed, as did the claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 and harassment on account of race under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment notes that oral reasons were given to the parties, but no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the Claimant withdrew the direct disability discrimination claim on 16 September 2025 and stated that it was therefore dismissed. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments on account of disability under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment on account of race under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.