Case 6004303/2025 · Employment Tribunal
W Hannon v DHL Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004303/2025
- Decision date
- 4 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
W Hannon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out W Hannon's claim against DHL Services Limited. It had written to the claimant on 30 December 2025 warning that it was considering strike-out because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 28 April 2025 and 29 June 2025 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply. Employment Judge Perry was satisfied that the grounds for strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately discuss the unfair dismissal claim identified in the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole and does not separately discuss the breach of contract claim identified in the listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.