Case 6004526/2024 · Employment Tribunal
H Rhea First v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited Second Respondent: Staffline Recruitment Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004526/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Appearances
- Venue
- Middlesbrough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
H Rhea First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningH Rhea brought complaints under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, age discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, and part-time worker detriment under the Part-Time Workers (Protection from Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 against G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited and Staffline Recruitment Limited. The case was heard at Middlesbrough on 27 February 2025 before Employment Judge Aspden.
The tribunal decided that the TUPE complaint had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. That complaint was dismissed.
The age discrimination and part-time worker detriment complaints were also found to be out of time. The tribunal held that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limits for those claims, so they were dismissed as well. As all claims were dismissed, the proceedings came to an end and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal held it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.