Case 6004582/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Okoye v Ultimate Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004582/2024
- Decision date
- 18 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley On
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Okoye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Deeley on 16, 17 and 18 July 2025. The judgment records that the claimant’s standalone complaint of direct sex discrimination, identified in the preliminary hearing record, had been withdrawn by email dated 14 February 2025 and was dismissed on withdrawal.
The remaining discrimination complaints recorded in the judgment were direct discrimination on the grounds of race, sex and pregnancy, together with harassment related to race. Those claims failed and were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not set out any further substantive reasoning for those dismissals.
The claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was withdrawn at the end of the final hearing on 18 July 2025 and was dismissed on withdrawal. No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records this as the claimant’s standalone complaint of direct sex discrimination, set out at paragraph 11 of the preliminary hearing record, withdrawn by email dated 14 February 2025. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | One of the complaints listed in paragraph 2.1 of the judgment; the extracted text gives no further substantive reasoning. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | One of the complaints listed in paragraph 2.1 of the judgment; the extracted text gives no further substantive reasoning. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | One of the complaints listed in paragraph 2.1 of the judgment; the extracted text gives no further substantive reasoning. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Harassment | The judgment records this as harassment related to race, listed at paragraph 2.2, and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn by the claimant at the end of the final hearing on 18 July 2025 and dismissed on withdrawal. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.