Case 6004596/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Georgiev v FedEx Express UK Transportation Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004596/2024
- Decision date
- 18 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Georgiev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Southampton from 15 to 18 December 2025 before Employment Judge Gray. The claimant appeared in person with assistance from court-appointed interpreters on specified hearing days, and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, direct race discrimination and victimisation failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not include findings or legal reasoning unless written reasons were later requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment states that the complaint failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not included because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The short judgment states that the direct race discrimination complaint failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not included because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The short judgment states that the victimisation complaint failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not included because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.