Case 6004630/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Costanzo v London Clubs Management Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004630/2024
- Decision date
- 13 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms C Gallagher, Mr Q Colborn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Costanzo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a hearing at Manchester from 9 to 13 March 2026, the tribunal found that Ms G Costanzo was not unfairly dismissed by London Clubs Management Ltd. Her unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded. The complaints of direct sex discrimination, harassment related to sex and victimisation were also found not well-founded and dismissed.
Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records the outcomes without setting out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning. It records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.