Case 6004981/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Kuranchie v Lodge Security Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6004981/2025
- Decision date
- 17 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beever Appearances
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Kuranchie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal amended the identity of the respondent to Lodge Security Ltd in light of a TUPE transfer that took place on 1 April 2026.
Mr S Kuranchie's holiday pay claim was well founded and succeeded. Lodge Security Ltd was ordered to pay him £278.40. His claims concerning underpayment of Statutory Sick Pay and breach of contract or unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of a 40-hour deduction were not well founded and were dismissed. Oral reasons were given on 17 July 2026.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £278 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The dismissed claims concerned underpayment of Statutory Sick Pay and an unauthorised deduction of wages described as a 40-hour deduction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The dismissed breach of contract claim concerned the 40-hour deduction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £278
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.