Case 6005366/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Peco v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6005366/2025
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Peco
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of unlawful age discrimination was dismissed following her unequivocal withdrawal of that claim on 14 July 2025.
The Tribunal struck out the breach of contract claim under rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. It stated that, because the claimant remained employed by the respondent, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider that claim.
The claimant's claim under Part I of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not finally determined in this judgment and was ordered to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claim of unlawful age discrimination was dismissed on the claimant's unequivocal withdrawal on 14 July 2025. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 as having no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant remained employed and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.