Case 6005738/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Thomas Hubbard v Aviva Employment Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6005738/2025
- Decision date
- 24 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Wood Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Thomas Hubbard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Aviva Employment Services Limited, including unauthorised deduction from wages, accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement, and unfair dismissal.
The judgment records that the wages and holiday entitlement claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. It further states that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that any claims for unauthorised deduction from wages, including non-payment of wages, are dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that any claim for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement is dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim is not well founded and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.