Case 6006051/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Burgess v ActionAid — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006051/2024
- Decision date
- 16 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Burgess
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing by CVP on 9 April 2025, Employment Judge Keogh struck out one complaint of harassment related to disability. The complaint concerned an allegation that a comment made on 18 January 2024, quoted in the judgment, amounted to disability-related harassment.
The tribunal recorded that a deposit order had been made on 21 January 2025 in respect of that allegation as a condition for continuing the claim, and that the deposit was not paid. On that basis, the harassment complaint was struck out.
The judgment also states that the claimant’s remaining complaints are to proceed to a final hearing listed to commence on 4 November 2026. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The tribunal struck out the claimant’s allegation that the 18 January 2024 comment quoted in the judgment amounted to harassment related to disability because a deposit order made on 21 January 2025 in respect of that allegation was not paid. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.