Case 6006392/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Fakir v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006392/2024
- Decision date
- 4 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Fakir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's claim of harassment related to religion in respect of detriment 3.1.1.1 of the agreed list of issues was well founded and succeeded.
All other claims, described in the written judgment as claims of harassment, direct discrimination and indirect discrimination, were not well founded and were dismissed. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant GBP 4,000 for injury to feelings plus GBP 427 interest.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claim of harassment related to religion in respect of detriment 3.1.1.1 of the agreed list of issues was well founded and succeeded. The award was not expressly split by claim. | Upheld | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that all other harassment claims were not well founded and were dismissed, but does not identify each protected characteristic in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that direct discrimination claims were not well founded and were dismissed, but does not identify each protected characteristic in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that indirect discrimination claims were not well founded and were dismissed, but does not identify each protected characteristic in the written judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,427
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.