Case 6006497/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jynnie Marem v Next Steps Ltd Mr Moataz Eldemrash Ms Zara Cardovilla — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006497/2024
- Decision date
- 12 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Jynnie Marem
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 23 July 2025 before Employment Judge Taylor sitting at London South, the tribunal considered claims brought by Ms Jynnie Marem against Next Steps Ltd, Mr Moataz Eldemrash and Ms Zara Cardovilla. The claims recorded in the judgment were claims of third party harassment.
The tribunal struck out and dismissed the claim against Mr Moataz Eldemrash in case no. 6006452/2024 under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2024, finding that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The same order was made in relation to the claim against Ms Zara Cardovilla in case no. 6006456/2024.
The tribunal also struck out and dismissed the part of the claim against Next Steps Ltd in case no. 6006497/2024 that alleged third party harassment, again on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 38. No remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Part of the claim by Ms Jynnie Marem against Next Steps Ltd (case no. 6006497/2024) alleging third party harassment was struck out and dismissed under Rule 38 Employment Tribunals Rules 2024 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Harassment | Claim by Ms Jynnie Marem against Mr Moataz Eldemrash (case no. 6006452/2024) for third party harassment was struck out and dismissed under Rule 38 Employment Tribunals Rules 2024 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Harassment | Claim by Ms Jynnie Marem against Ms Zara Cardovilla (case no. 6006456/2024) for third party harassment was struck out and dismissed under Rule 38 Employment Tribunals Rules 2024 as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38 Employment Tribunals Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.