Case 6006571/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Fox v Ramsay Health Care UK Operations Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6006571/2024
- Decision date
- 20 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Fox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anderson refused Ms Fox's application to postpone the hearing and proceeded in her absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The Tribunal struck out the claims of direct age discrimination, direct disability discrimination, harassment related to age, harassment related to disability, failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation, public interest disclosure detriment, constructive unfair dismissal, and breach of contract concerning notice pay. The stated reason was material non-compliance with the unless order sent to the parties on 18 August 2025; the judgment did not determine the merits of those claims.
The unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay claims were found to have been sufficiently particularised in accordance with the unless order. Those claims were not finally determined, and a separate case management order was produced to progress them. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
11 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The direct age discrimination claim was struck out for material non-compliance with the unless order sent on 18 August 2025. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The direct disability discrimination claim was struck out for material non-compliance with the unless order sent on 18 August 2025. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The harassment related to age claim was struck out for material non-compliance with the unless order sent on 18 August 2025. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Harassment | The harassment related to disability claim was struck out for material non-compliance with the unless order sent on 18 August 2025. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim alleging failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments was struck out for material non-compliance with the unless order sent on 18 August 2025. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim was struck out for material non-compliance with the unless order sent on 18 August 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.