Case 6006703/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Represented himself For the v Mr Manson, Solicitor — 2026
- Case reference
- 6006703/2024
- Decision date
- 26 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cuthbert Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Represented himself For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew his claims of breach of contract, unlawful deductions from wages and holiday pay. Those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The Tribunal also recorded that the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race and victimisation under the Equality Act failed and were dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, but the written judgment contains no detailed findings or remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The direct race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The harassment related to race claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim under the Equality Act failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.