Case 6006896/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Kidan Nags v Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6006896/2024
- Decision date
- 17 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Kidan Nags
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 14, 15, 16 and 17 October 2025 before Employment Judge Jones. The claimant, Ms Kidan Nags, appeared in person and the respondent, Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, was represented by counsel. No lay members are listed in the written record.
The tribunal's judgment records that the complaints of victimisation were not well founded and were dismissed. The written decision does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons, but it does record that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the complaints of victimisation were not well founded and were dismissed. No separate remedy was recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.