Case 6007229/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Charmayne Kelland v Asda Stores Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 6007229/2024
- Decision date
- 2 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sanger Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Charmayne Kelland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant remained employed by the respondent as a Night Replenishment Operative. After a workplace accident on 23-24 May 2024, she believed she should have received accident pay or full sick pay, and the tribunal accepted that she was genuinely confused by payslips, corrections and references to accident-related pay.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed for fewer than 39 weeks and was therefore not eligible for company sick pay. It found that statutory sick pay was properly calculated from day 4 of her absence to the end of the claim period, and that no amount owed to her had gone unpaid. The holiday pay claim was not pursued and was dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found no unlawful deduction because the claimant was not eligible for company sick pay and statutory sick pay had been properly calculated. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the unpaid holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal after the claimant confirmed she did not seek to pursue it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.