Case 6007763/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Stephanie Bryan v The Big Lemon CIC and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007763/2025
- Decision date
- 14 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walters Appearances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Stephanie Bryan
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Ms Stephanie Bryan's complaints of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 against The Big Lemon CIC and Samantha Bingham. The hearing took place in public by video at Bristol on 12-14 August 2026 before Employment Judge Walters.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaints of harassment related to disability under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 against both respondents. The judgment, dated 14 August 2026, does not set out reasons for the dismissals or record a monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaints of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 were dismissed against both respondents. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaints of harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010 were dismissed against both respondents. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 15 Equality Act 2010
- Section 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.