Case 6007985/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Irfan Rafique v Primark Stores Limited Heard: Manchester Employment Tribunals — 2026
- Case reference
- 6007985/2024
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Attendance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Irfan Rafique
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal decided that Mr Irfan Rafique was not unfairly dismissed in breach of section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The Tribunal found that Mr Rafique was not discriminated against on the grounds of race, religion or belief, or sex in breach of section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. It stated that these allegations had no merit.
The Tribunal also found that Mr Rafique was not harassed in relation to age under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 and stated that this allegation had no merit. The proceedings were dismissed, and no monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.