Case 6008071/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Gallagher v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008071/2024
- Decision date
- 5 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woodhead
- Venue
- in person at the Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 1 June 2026, Miss Gallagher withdrew her complaints of unlawful harassment related to sex under section 26 Equality Act 2010 and health and safety detriment under section 44(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. The Tribunal dismissed both complaints on withdrawal.
The Tribunal found that Miss Gallagher's complaint of direct sex discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and dismissed it. Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment does not record the underlying factual findings or reasoning. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The complaint of unlawful harassment related to sex under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the final hearing on 1 June 2026. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Other | The health and safety detriment complaint under section 44(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the final hearing on 1 June 2026. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The direct sex discrimination complaint under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.