Case 6008627/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Abdellatif v Newlaw Legal Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 6008627/2025
- Decision date
- 20 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Williams Tribunal
- Panel members
- R Hartwell, L Thomas
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Abdellatif
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Cardiff between 16 and 20 February 2026 before Employment Judge A Williams sitting with Tribunal Members R Hartwell and L Thomas. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mrs Skeaping, solicitor.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim of harassment related to race was well-founded and succeeded, and ordered the respondent to pay £4,500 as compensation for injury to feelings. The claims of direct race discrimination and of harassment / discriminatory constructive unfair dismissal were found not well-founded and were dismissed.
The claimant's protected disclosure detriment claim and her protected disclosure constructive unfair dismissal claim were each dismissed on withdrawal. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will be provided only on request within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Harassment related to race well-founded; injury to feelings award of £4,500. | Upheld | Race | £4,500 |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim not well-founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim framed as harassment / discriminatory constructive unfair dismissal; not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Protected disclosure detriment claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Protected disclosure constructive unfair dismissal claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.