Mr Jones v NSC Global Limited — 2025

Case reference: 6008726/2024
Decision date: 11 September 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Richard Wood
Venue: CVP

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Jones

Respondent

NSC Global Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a record of a preliminary hearing heard by CVP on 4 September 2025 before Employment Judge Richard Wood. The claimant, Mr Jones, appeared in person and the respondent, NSC Global Limited, was represented by Mr L Dal Bianco, in-house counsel.

The tribunal stated that all claims were dismissed because it decided that it did not have jurisdiction to hear them. The reason given was that the ET1 had been lodged out of time. No merits findings or remedy issues were determined in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	Dismissed at a preliminary hearing because the tribunal held that the ET1 had been lodged out of time and it therefore did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim.	Dismissed	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed at a preliminary hearing because the tribunal held that the ET1 had been lodged out of time and it therefore did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.