Case 6009088/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Malek v Trove Wilmslow Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009088/2024
- Decision date
- 14 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Malek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 because the respondent did not attend, had not provided a response, and did not otherwise seek to contest the claim. Employment Judge Cookson heard the matter in Manchester on 7 February 2025 and issued the written record on 14 February 2025.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that between 5 May 2024 and 2 June 2024 the claimant was entitled to £1,609.83 gross (£1,454.60 net) but was only paid £700. The judgment therefore ordered payment of £909.83 gross, with tax and National Insurance to be dealt with by the claimant.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint. It found that when employment ended the claimant had 28 days of accrued but untaken holiday remaining. On the basis of earnings over the 12 weeks ending on termination, the tribunal set a weekly pay figure of £285.03 gross and awarded £1,596.17 gross for holiday pay, again stating that tax and National Insurance were the claimant’s responsibility.
The breach of contract complaint was also upheld. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice on termination but did not receive it, and awarded £285.03 gross. The written record states a total award of £2,635.80, although that figure does not match the sum of the individual amounts stated in the body of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 5 May 2024 to 2 June 2024. The claimant’s pay slip showed entitlement to £1,609.83 gross (£1,454.60 net) and she was paid £700, so £909.83 gross was awarded. | Upheld | — | £910 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found a well-founded complaint of unpaid holiday pay on termination. It found 28 days’ holiday remained and recorded a weekly entitlement of £285.03 gross, awarding £1,596.17 gross. The written record’s total award does not arithmetically match the three monetary awards set out in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,596 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice on termination and did not receive it. It awarded £285.03 gross. | Upheld | — | £285 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,636
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.