Case 6009133/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Polly Loughlin v Arc Hospitality Recruitment Solutions Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 6009133/2024
- Decision date
- 22 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Illing Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Polly Loughlin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Polly Loughlin's complaints of direct disability discrimination and unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability against Arc Hospitality Recruitment Solutions Limited as not well-founded. It also dismissed the complaint of harassment related to disability as not well-founded.
The tribunal found that Loughlin was not an employee or worker of Wembley National Stadium Limited at the relevant time. Wembley was neither a principal to her nor an agent of the principal. The tribunal therefore dismissed the direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability and disability-related harassment claims against Wembley because it lacked jurisdiction to determine them.
Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records no further reasoning for the dismissals as not well-founded and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination: dismissed as not well-founded against Arc Hospitality Recruitment Solutions Limited and for lack of jurisdiction against Wembley National Stadium Limited. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability: dismissed as not well-founded against Arc Hospitality Recruitment Solutions Limited and for lack of jurisdiction against Wembley National Stadium Limited. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability: paragraph 3 dismisses the complaint as not well-founded without expressly identifying the respondent. Paragraph 4 separately dismisses the harassment claim against Wembley National Stadium Limited for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.