Case 6010112/2025 · Employment Tribunal
X v [1] The Chief Constable of Gwent Police [2] Susan Barlow — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010112/2025
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Ms S Hurds, Mr A McLean
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous Tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of direct disability discrimination, harassment related to disability, and unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, all relating to his HIV diagnosis. The complaint of indirect disability discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. All claims against the second respondent were dismissed on the claimant's withdrawal under Rule 51.
In addition to monetary compensation, the Tribunal made recommendations: a written risk assessment prior to taking action in respect of any officer diagnosed with HIV; consultation with the claimant or a specialist HIV organisation prior to implementation of the respondent's HIV policy; and HIV training within 12 months for frontline officers and their supervisors and for occupational health, with the training package reviewed/endorsed by an organisation with specialist HIV knowledge.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £40,200 for injury to feelings (comprising £35,200 placed at the top of the middle Vento band and £5,000 of aggravated damages relating to the respondent's disclosure of the claimant's HIV diagnosis to a witness in the proceedings without the claimant's knowledge or consent), plus £2,927.08 of interest. PDF was truncated.
Claims and outcomes
4 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £43,127
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.