Case 6010624/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Elley v Advanced Fire Protection Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6010624/2025
- Decision date
- 23 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Elley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld Ms R Elley’s constructive unfair dismissal claim against Advanced Fire Protection Ltd and found that she was unfairly dismissed. The written judgment does not record a remedy or monetary award.
The complaints of discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, direct sex discrimination, harassment related to sex, and breach of the flexible working regulations were found not well founded and dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but the written judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as constructive unfair dismissal and states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Complaint of direct sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Flexible working | Complaint described in the judgment as breach of the flexible working regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.