Case 6010865/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Mason v Intesa (Leicester) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6010865/2025
- Decision date
- 17 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Mason
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Nash, sitting alone at London Central by cloud video platform on 17 September 2025, heard the claimant in person; the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages for the period 11 November to 2 December 2024 contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and had failed to pay her annual leave contrary to Reg 16 of the Working Time Regulations. The tribunal also found that the respondent wrongfully dismissed the claimant and owed unpaid notice.
The tribunal further found that, at the time proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a statement of employment particulars. The judge considered it just and equitable to increase the award by the higher amount under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, being £1,830.40.
The respondent was ordered to pay £817.96 for unlawful deductions, £246.19 for holiday pay, and £397.19 for unpaid notice, together with the £1,830.40 uplift, producing a total award of £3,291.74.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deductions from wages for the period 11 November to 2 December 2024 contrary to s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996. Award is gross of statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £818 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay annual leave contrary to Reg 16 Working Time Regulations 1998 (judgment cites 'Working Time Regulations 1996'). Award is gross of statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £246 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal — unpaid notice; award is net of statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £397 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 duty to provide a statement of employment particulars; tribunal increased the award by the higher amount under s.38 Employment Act 2002 (£1,830.40). | Upheld | — | £1,830 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,292
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Reg 16 Working Time Regulations
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.