Case 6011173/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Weston v Yunex Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011173/2024
- Decision date
- 27 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Weston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Cadney at Bristol on 19 August 2025 to determine an amendment application by the claimant and a strike-out application by the respondent. The judge granted the claimant's application to amend to include allegations of age-related harassment under s.26 of the Equality Act 2010.
The judge dismissed the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's public interest disclosure detriment and automatic unfair dismissal claims. The respondent had argued that the disclosures relied on (emails and letters from 2020, 2022 and 2023 concerning the IKOS patent and the claimant's asserted right to be identified as inventor and to purchase the patent for 1 euro) did not amount to protected disclosures because they were private matters with no public interest content. The judge concluded that the arguments were finely balanced and that, at this relatively early stage and before evidence was heard, it could not be said there was no reasonable prospect of the final tribunal accepting the claimant's case that he reasonably believed the disclosures were in the public interest.
No substantive findings were made on the underlying claims and no remedy was awarded. Agreed case management directions for the final hearing are set out in a separate case management order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Preliminary hearing only: the claimant's application to amend to include allegations of age-related harassment (s.26 Equality Act 2010) was granted. The substantive harassment claim was not adjudicated at this hearing. | Other | Age | — |
| Whistleblowing | Preliminary hearing only: the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's public interest disclosure detriment / automatic unfair dismissal claims as having no reasonable prospect of success was dismissed. The substantive whistleblowing claims were not determined and proceed to final hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Automatic constructive unfair dismissal under s.103A ERA 1996 was part of the strike-out application which was dismissed; the underlying constructive dismissal claim was not adjudicated at this preliminary hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- Patents Act
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.