Case 6011319/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Vince v John Lewis plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 6011319/2025
- Decision date
- 14 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taft REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Vince
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Vince brought complaints against John Lewis plc which were heard by video at Reading Employment Tribunal on 13 and 14 May 2026 before Employment Judge Taft. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by Mr Pickard, counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also recorded that the complaint of breach of contract, specified as notice pay, was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time. No remedy or monetary award was recorded because both complaints were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written record identifies this as breach of contract (notice pay). | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.