Case 6011471/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dale Knights v John Lewis plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 6011471/2024
- Decision date
- 16 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bartlett
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr Bury, Dr von Maydell-Koch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dale Knights
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent from 26 July 2020 until his dismissal on 8 July 2024. The respondent accepted that the claimant was disabled by Crohn's disease and heart disease/angina, and that it had knowledge of disability. The tribunal found that the reason for dismissal was ill health capability and that the dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses.
For the Equality Act section 15 claim, the tribunal found that the respondent relied on legitimate aims connected with operational effectiveness, meeting customer demand, workforce reliability, planning, allocation of work, attendance, and use of resources. It concluded that dismissal was a proportionate means of achieving those aims, including because adjustments had been tried and the claimant's absence pattern had not materially changed.
For the reasonable adjustments claim, the tribunal found that the pleaded PCP of a 3% sickness absence trigger under the short-term sickness policy had not been applied to the claimant. It found that the claimant had been dealt with under a long-term sickness capability process and had not suffered disadvantage from the pleaded PCP.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- band of reasonable responses
- Hammersmith LBC v Keable
- Morgan v Electrolux Ltd
- London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets v Hitt
- Spencer v Paragon Wallpapers Ltd
- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.20 Equality Act 2010
- s.21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.