Case 6011904/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Griffin v Stride Courier Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 6011904/2025
- Decision date
- 17 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms J Hiser, Mr K Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Griffin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Ms Griffin’s claims against Stride Courier Services Ltd for failure to make reasonable adjustments, disability-related harassment and victimisation were not well-founded and dismissed them. The judgment does not record further factual findings or reasoning for those conclusions.
Ms Griffin’s claims for unlawful deduction from wages and notice pay were withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal. Her claim for failure to provide written particulars of employment was dismissed because it could not be pursued as a stand-alone claim. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claims were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment claims were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claims were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claim for failure to provide written particulars of employment could not be pursued as a stand-alone claim and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.