Case 6012273/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Ward (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012273/2025
- Decision date
- 24 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Ward (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs P Welton withdrew complaint 4.1.2, concerning failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and complaint 6.1.2, concerning disability-related harassment. The tribunal dismissed those complaints on withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the remaining complaints of unfair dismissal, unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and disability-related harassment were not well-founded and dismissed them. The judgment records no monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint 4.1.2, alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Complaint 6.1.2, alleging disability-related harassment, was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The remaining unfair dismissal complaint was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The remaining complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The remaining complaint of disability-related harassment was found not well-founded and dismissed. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.