Case 6012532/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Odebode v Look Ahead Care and Support Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012532/2024
- Decision date
- 20 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Odebode
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public, the tribunal considered complaints of race discrimination, sex discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, victimisation, and age discrimination.
The tribunal struck out the race discrimination, sex discrimination, religion or belief discrimination, and victimisation complaints under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a), finding that they had no reasonable prospect of success. The age discrimination claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Victimisation | Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed because the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
- just and equitable time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.