Case 6012552/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Abigail Dansoa v North London NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 6012552/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr A Adolphus, Mr P Secher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Abigail Dansoa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sitting at London Central on 6-8 October 2025 before Employment Judge Khan, with lay members Mr A Adolphus and Mr P Secher, found that Abigail Dansoa was disabled by reference to EUPD from October/November 2022. The respondent conceded actual knowledge of that disability from the same date. The tribunal also found that she was disabled by reference to tumours (fibroids) from May 2024 and that the respondent had constructive knowledge of that disability from that date.
The tribunal held that North London NHS Foundation Trust failed to comply with its statutory duty to make reasonable adjustments when it did not support the claimant with one homeworking day each week in November 2022, preferably but not exclusively every Thursday, and when it did not support her with one homeworking day each week on or around 17 May 2024, being any day. It further held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit in respect of the November 2022 failure.
The written judgment records these liability findings only. No monetary award or remedy figure is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with the statutory duty to make reasonable adjustments by not supporting the claimant with one homeworking day each week in November 2022, preferably but not exclusively every Thursday, and again on or around 17 May 2024, being any day. It held that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit for the November 2022 failure. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.