Case 6012740/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Mills v East Lancashire Healthcare Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 6012740/2025
- Decision date
- 1 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Johnson Employment
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs N Mills did not present her complaint of constructive unfair dismissal within the time limit under section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that it had been reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time and dismissed it.
The tribunal also found that the complaints of discrimination, harassment and victimisation were out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. It held that it was not just and equitable to extend time and dismissed those complaints. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic underlying the discrimination or harassment complaints. With all complaints dismissed, the tribunal cancelled the final hearing listed for 24 to 28 May 2027. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Dismissed as out of time under section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment describes this only as a discrimination complaint and does not identify the protected characteristic. The gov.uk listing category is Age Discrimination, but the judgment does not confirm this. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed as out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The judgment does not identify a protected characteristic. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed as out of time under section 123 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.